The spine has been stabilized or a nonoperative plan established, the initial examination has been documented, ventilation and circulation appear adequate, and an individualized blood-pressure strategy is in place. The neuro-ICU task now changes. The cord injury is no longer only a motor and sensory lesion; it is a disconnection syndrome affecting respiratory mechanics, sympathetic control, venous flow, gastrointestinal motility, bladder emptying, skin integrity, and the ability to mobilize. The patient may look deceptively stable at this transition. A lower cervical injury may preserve quiet breathing but abolish effective cough, neurogenic vasoplegia may coexist with occult hemorrhage, and the absence of early pressure injury, ileus, or thrombosis only means that prevention still has time to work.

Respiratory risk begins with the neurologic level but is not determined by it. The diaphragm receives its principal innervation from C3 through C5, the scalenes from cervical roots, the intercostals from T1 through T11, and the abdominal expiratory muscles from the lower thoracic and upper lumbar cord. An injury above C3 usually eliminates independent diaphragmatic ventilation. At C3 through C5, diaphragmatic function is variable and may deteriorate as cord edema evolves. A lower cervical injury can leave the diaphragm strong enough to produce a reassuring tidal volume while disconnecting the intercostal and abdominal muscles. The patient can inhale but cannot generate the inspiratory volume, expiratory pressure, and dynamic airway compression required for an effective cough. A thoracic injury usually preserves inspiration but may still substantially weaken forceful expiration. This distinction between the ventilatory pump and the cough pump is central to bedside assessment. (Wiles et al., 2024; Hendershot & O’Phelan, 2023)

Respiratory decline often unfolds over several days rather than at impact. Cord edema, diaphragmatic fatigue, aspiration, retained secretions, atelectasis, rib fractures, pulmonary contusion, opioids, and repeated operations accumulate. Loss of intercostal tone permits paradoxical inward chest-wall motion, while loss of abdominal tone changes the resting position and mechanical advantage of the diaphragm. In tetraplegia, vital capacity can paradoxically be better supine because the abdominal contents support the flaccid diaphragm; sitting the patient upright may worsen both vital capacity and orthostatic hypotension. An abdominal binder can improve upright mechanics in selected patients, but its effect on ventilation, abdominal pressure, skin, and comfort should be measured rather than assumed. Aspiration risk, obesity, abdominal distension, and lung injury may overturn the expected positional response.

The useful respiratory examination is a trend, not a single forced maneuver or oxygen saturation. Follow respiratory rate and pattern, work of breathing, speech and voice strength, paradoxical chest motion, secretion burden, suction frequency, swallowing, carbon dioxide, vital capacity, maximal inspiratory pressure or negative inspiratory force, and cough effectiveness. A vital capacity approaching 15 mL/kg or a negative inspiratory force less negative than approximately −20 cm H₂O should heighten concern, but neither is a validated autonomous intubation threshold in acute spinal cord injury. Both are effort- and position-dependent. Conversely, acceptable numbers do not neutralize worsening bulbar function, recurrent plugging, progressive hypercapnia, increasing oxygen need, or visible fatigue. The attending decision is whether the trajectory leaves enough reserve for a controlled airway tomorrow, not merely whether the patient can avoid intubation during today’s examination.

When intubation is necessary, its rationale should be explicit: ventilatory-pump failure, airway-protection failure, secretion failure, impending operative airway compromise, or some combination. A reasonable initial strategy is a lung-protective tidal volume based on predicted body weight, with PEEP adjusted to recruitment, oxygenation, compliance, and hemodynamic tolerance. Historical SCI practice often used tidal volumes of 10 to 15 mL/kg to recruit atelectatic lung and mobilize secretions. The evidence does not establish a superior universal strategy. A 2024 systematic review found few, heterogeneous, and conflicting studies; the small randomized study within it did not demonstrate a significant difference in ventilator-free breathing between approximately 12 to 15 and 6 to 8 mL/kg (Meregildo-Rodríguez et al., 2024). High volumes may recruit lung but can impose harmful strain when aspiration, contusion, pneumonia, or ARDS is present. Recruitment and secretion mobilization should therefore be performed deliberately rather than using a large tidal volume as an all-purpose substitute.

Secretion management must be scheduled before radiographic collapse develops. Sympathetic interruption and relative vagal predominance can increase bronchial tone and mucus production, while denervated expiratory muscles cannot clear the resulting load. Humidification, adequate hydration without fluid overload, bronchodilation when bronchospasm is present, manually assisted cough, mechanical insufflation–exsufflation, suction, positioning, chest physiotherapy, and early mobilization should be combined according to physiology. Drying secretions indiscriminately may exchange frequent suctioning for an obstructing plug. Untreated pneumothorax, unstable chest or abdominal injury, severe ileus, and concurrent intracranial pathology may constrain individual techniques. Bronchoscopy is appropriate for persistent lobar collapse or suspected plugging that does not respond to noninvasive clearance, but repeated bronchoscopies should prompt reassessment of the daily clearance system rather than becoming the system. The 2025 Australian and New Zealand respiratory guideline and the 2026 multidisciplinary S2k guideline both support early structured respiratory assessment and coordinated airway-clearance care, while explicitly revealing that many individual interventions rest on very-low-certainty evidence or consensus rather than definitive trials. (Tranter et al., 2025; Raab et al., 2026)

Extubation requires more than passing a spontaneous-breathing trial. The patient must sustain ventilation, protect the airway, mobilize secretions between treatments, and tolerate the respiratory position expected after extubation. Examine cough strength and suction frequency, swallowing and bulbar function, evolving diaphragmatic performance, planned procedures, and cervical soft-tissue swelling. A cuff-leak assessment may contribute after anterior cervical surgery but cannot independently establish airway safety. Noninvasive ventilation can support selected cooperative patients with preserved airway protection, particularly those with lower-level weakness or nocturnal hypoventilation, but it does not rescue an ineffective cough or recurrent aspiration. A failed extubation may be technically hazardous in an immobilized cervical spine, so the reintubation operator and method should be anticipated before the tube is removed.

Tracheostomy should be discussed early when a motor-complete high cervical injury, persistent secretion burden, repeated extubation failure, or multiple procedures makes prolonged airway support likely. It may reduce sedation requirements and facilitate pulmonary toilet, communication, mobilization, and ventilator liberation. A 2025 systematic review and meta-analysis associated tracheostomy within approximately seven days with shorter ventilation and ICU and hospital stays, but the underlying studies were predominantly observational and did not establish a mortality benefit (Zameni et al., 2025). Injury level informs probability; it does not itself mandate a procedure on a particular day. Anterior cervical fixation is not an absolute prohibition, but timing and incision relationships should be coordinated with the spine surgeon.

The first cardiovascular discipline is to distinguish spinal shock from neurogenic shock. Spinal shock is an evolving neurologic loss of motor, sensory, reflex, and autonomic activity below the lesion. Neurogenic shock is a circulatory phenotype caused by interruption of descending sympathetic pathways, producing arterial and venous dilation, reduced preload, and—especially with cervical or upper thoracic injury—loss of cardiac sympathetic input. The two may coexist, but neither implies the other. Warm skin and bradycardia support neurogenic physiology but are neither sensitive nor specific; an inappropriately normal heart rate may be more revealing than overt bradycardia.

Neurogenic shock remains a diagnosis made within a trauma differential. Before attributing hypotension to the cord, actively exclude hemorrhage, tension pneumothorax, tamponade, myocardial dysfunction, pulmonary embolism, sepsis, medication effects, and true hypovolemia. Examination, serial perfusion markers, urine output, arterial pressure, and focused echocardiography help identify the dominant phenotype. Once hypovolemia has been corrected, neurogenic vasoplegia is primarily a capacitance problem, not permission for repeated crystalloid loading. Excess fluid may transiently improve pressure while worsening pulmonary edema, secretion clearance, bowel edema, and ventilator liberation. Norepinephrine is often physiologically attractive because it restores vascular tone with some beta support; phenylephrine may worsen bradycardia or reduce cardiac output, and dopamine carries greater tachyarrhythmic liability. These are physiologic and observational arguments, not comparative-outcome proof. The 2024 AO Spine/Praxis guideline found insufficient evidence to recommend a specific vasopressor (Kwon et al., 2024).

The blood-pressure target was established during initial resuscitation, but ICU care must continuously audit its cost. The 2024 guideline weakly suggested augmenting MAP to at least 75 to 80 mm Hg without actively augmenting beyond 90 to 95 for three to seven days; certainty was very low. The subsequent 2025 MAPS randomized trial assigned 92 patients to an augmented target above 85 to 90 or a conventional target above 65 to 70. It found no significant difference in six-month motor or sensory recovery, while the augmented group had longer ventilation and more respiratory complications, 78% versus 39% (Sajdeya et al., 2025). The trial was underpowered, only a minority contributed to the complete-case six-month analysis, and achieved pressures in the conventional group were often higher than its nominal floor. It does not prove that MAP 65 is safe for every injured cord. It does argue against treating 85 or 90 as a consequence-free universal minimum. Avoid hypotension rigorously, then individualize augmentation while watching the neurologic examination, cardiac output, perfusion markers, pulmonary congestion, vasopressor dose, and arrhythmias. Injury-site pressure monitoring and CSF drainage remain investigational or center-specific; an attractive spinal-cord-perfusion equation should not be mistaken for a routine validated monitor.

Bradyarrhythmias deserve an anticipatory plan. They are most prominent in cervical and high thoracic injury, often intensify during the first week, and may persist for several weeks. A systematic review found bradycardia in 17% to 77% of cervical injuries versus 0% to 13% of thoracolumbar injuries, but the source studies were small and heterogeneous (Hector et al., 2013). Hypoxia, endotracheal suctioning, turning, defecation, and other vagal stimuli can precipitate profound bradycardia, sinus pauses, or asystole. Continuous telemetry, correction of hypoxia and electrolytes, preoxygenation before suction, avoidance of unnecessarily prolonged stimulation, and immediately available atropine are basic safeguards. Treat perfusion rather than a number alone. Symptomatic vagal bradycardia can receive atropine; recurrent shock, pauses, or asystole may require epinephrine or another chronotropic infusion and temporary pacing. Evidence for enteral beta agonists or methylxanthines is limited to observational reports and small series. Persistent life-threatening events warrant cardiology or electrophysiology involvement and consideration of permanent pacing, although no SCI-specific implantation threshold is validated.

Orthostatic hypotension emerges as mobilization begins because venous pooling is no longer corrected by sympathetic vasoconstriction or an adequate reflex tachycardia. Gradual head elevation, tilt-table progression, an abdominal binder, lower-extremity compression, and careful adjustment of fluid, salt, sedatives, and vasodilating medications may help. Pharmacologic support can be added when these measures fail. Autonomic dysreflexia is a different syndrome. As spinal reflexes recover, principally with lesions at or above T6, a noxious stimulus below the lesion may cause an abrupt pressure increase relative to the patient’s usually low baseline, headache, flushing or sweating above the lesion, vasoconstriction below it, and variable bradycardia. If mechanically safe, elevate the head, loosen constrictive devices, and inspect the urinary drainage system first; a kinked catheter or distended bladder is the commonest trigger, followed by bowel and skin sources. Persistent severe hypertension warrants a rapidly acting, short-duration agent according to local protocol while the trigger is removed.

Temperature is another autonomic vital sign. A high lesion impairs vasoconstriction, shivering, and sweating below the injury, allowing core temperature to drift toward the environment. External warming and cooling devices can themselves injure insensate skin and require direct inspection. Hypothermia can compound coagulopathy and bradycardia. Hyperthermia should not be labeled “quad fever” until pneumonia, urinary or line infection, wound infection, VTE or pulmonary embolism, drug fever, transfusion reaction, and other causes have been evaluated. Neurogenic hyperthermia is real but remains a diagnosis of exclusion. A 2026 retrospective study of only 24 patients associated greater fever burden during the first 72 hours with poorer neurologic status at discharge (Rochat et al., 2026). That finding is hypothesis-generating; it does not prove that aggressive temperature reduction improves neurologic recovery. Reliable core-temperature monitoring and avoidance of sustained extremes remain reasonable while the cause is investigated.

VTE prevention begins immediately because paralysis supplies stasis, trauma and surgery supply endothelial injury, and systemic inflammation supplies hypercoagulability. Loss of sensation also makes clinical DVT less reliable. Apply intermittent pneumatic compression when the limbs permit, but do not regard mechanical prophylaxis as sufficient for the prolonged high-risk interval. Low-molecular-weight heparin is generally preferred once active bleeding is controlled and the operative plan allows it. The Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine recommends at least eight weeks of anticoagulant prophylaxis when mobility remains substantially limited and advises against routine prophylactic vena-cava filters or surveillance ultrasound in asymptomatic patients (Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine, 2016).

The precise postoperative start remains individualized in the presence of intracranial hemorrhage, solid-organ injury, epidural bleeding, drains, or planned reoperation, but every delay should have an explicit reason and a scheduled reassessment. A 2026 TQIP study included 15,960 adults with blunt SCI who underwent decompression within 24 hours. Prophylaxis started by postoperative day one, defined as less than 48 hours, was associated with lower VTE incidence than later prophylaxis, 4.7% versus 5.9%, without a statistically significant increase in same-level spinal reoperation (Abbas et al., 2026). This was a retrospective propensity-matched analysis across heterogeneous centers, so residual confounding and clinician selection remain plausible. It strengthens the argument against habitual delay; it does not establish an identical clock for every injured patient.

Gastrointestinal dysfunction begins with spinal shock, autonomic interruption, immobility, opioids, vasopressors, trauma, surgery, and electrolyte disturbance. Ileus and distension impair feeding, elevate the diaphragm, reduce respiratory reserve, and increase reflux and aspiration risk; later, fecal loading can trigger autonomic dysreflexia. Follow the abdominal examination, distension, stool and flatus, and feeding tolerance; decompress when necessary; correct electrolytes; and minimize avoidable opioids and anticholinergic drugs. “Neurogenic ileus” should not prevent evaluation for mechanical obstruction, ischemia, intra-abdominal injury, infection, or medication toxicity.

Begin enteral nutrition when resuscitation and gastrointestinal function permit, but do not assume acute SCI produces burn-like energy expenditure. Paralysis and declining lean-tissue activity may lower caloric requirements, so equation-based overfeeding can increase carbon dioxide production, hyperglycemia, and hepatic steatosis. Indirect calorimetry is preferable when available. Protein delivery, micronutrient sufficiency, renal function, wound healing, and actual rehabilitation workload matter more than an indiscriminately high calorie target. Cervical injury—especially after anterior cervical surgery—also carries meaningful dysphagia and silent-aspiration risk, so oral intake should follow a credible swallowing assessment rather than a strong bedside voice alone.

A bowel program should begin once obstruction and clinically important ileus have been excluded instead of waiting for refractory constipation. During spinal shock, bowel activity is often areflexic. After reflexes return, a supraconal lesion generally produces a reflexic bowel with retained rectal reflexes and increased sphincter tone, often favoring scheduled oral agents, rectal medication, and digital stimulation. Conus or cauda-equina injury produces an areflexic bowel, in which manual evacuation and careful stool-consistency management are usually more effective. The regimen must balance predictable evacuation against diarrhea, dehydration, perineal moisture, and pressure injury. Current guidance supports an individualized, structured, repeatedly reassessed program rather than a universal laxative sequence (Johns et al., 2021).

The bladder is usually areflexic during spinal shock, making acute retention and overdistension likely. An indwelling catheter is appropriate during resuscitation, vasopressor titration, and major operations because it protects the bladder and supplies continuous output data. Maintain a closed, unobstructed system and inspect the tubing whenever urine output falls or autonomic symptoms appear. The catheter should not become permanent through inertia. Once hemodynamics and procedures permit, assess transition to scheduled intermittent catheterization using catheterized volumes, fluid intake, hand function, caregiver support, urethral anatomy, and the rehabilitation plan. The AUA/SUFU guideline generally favors intermittent over indwelling catheterization when feasible, with later risk stratification and urodynamics used to identify high storage pressures, poor compliance, or detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia that threaten the upper urinary tract (Ginsberg et al., 2021).

A 2025 propensity-matched cohort found volitional bladder-control recovery in 17.1% of patients managed with intermittent catheterization versus 11.6% with indwelling catheters, with an adjusted odds ratio of 2.11; sacral motor and sensory recovery did not differ (Aude et al., 2025). Catheter method at rehabilitation discharge may still encode unmeasured injury severity, independence, or caregiver factors, so this association is not causal proof. Bacteriuria alone should not trigger antibiotics. Fever in a catheterized patient is not automatically a urinary infection, and unnecessary culture-driven treatment promotes resistance and diagnostic anchoring.

Pressure-injury prevention starts on admission. Paralysis removes spontaneous repositioning, sensory loss removes warning pain, vasoplegia and shock reduce tissue perfusion, moisture and nutritional deficits reduce tissue tolerance, and collars, splints, tubing, warming devices, and compression equipment create focal loads. Remove the patient from transport surfaces as soon as safely possible. Use an appropriate pressure-redistribution surface, offload the heels, and inspect the occiput, scapulae, sacrum, heels, and skin beneath every device. An unstable spine does not mean the patient can never be turned; it means turning must be coordinated, alignment-preserving, and performed by enough trained staff using lift rather than shear. Repositioning frequency should be individualized to tissue findings, the support surface, hemodynamic stability, and spinal precautions. No mattress abolishes the need to reposition, and every heating or cooling device applied to insensate skin requires inspection. (National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel et al., 2025)

Rehabilitation is not an event that begins after the ICU; it is a property of ICU care. Once mechanically and medically safe, begin positioning, passive range of motion, contracture prevention, upper-extremity and shoulder protection, splinting, respiratory-muscle work, communication support, swallowing therapy, and graded upright tolerance. Minimize sedation to the degree compatible with safety and address pain, delirium, sleep disruption, and loss of communication. Engage physical medicine and rehabilitation, physical and occupational therapy, speech-language pathology, respiratory physiotherapy, psychology, nursing, social work, and the receiving spinal rehabilitation program early. Repeat the ISNCSCI examination after sedation, shock, hypothermia, and distracting injuries improve, because an unreliable early examination should not be converted into false prognostic certainty. The 2025 Australian and New Zealand physiotherapy guideline synthesized 76 randomized trials, yet many recommendations still relied on low- or very-low-certainty evidence or consensus (Glinsky et al., 2025). Early multidisciplinary rehabilitation is compelling for preventing pulmonary complications, contractures, pressure injury, deconditioning, delirium, and learned dependency; no trial establishes that an arbitrary start time regenerates the injured cord.

References

• Abbas, A., Koucheki, R., Toor, J., Fowler, R., Nathens, A., Yee, A., Lewis, S., Wilson, J. R., Witiw, C. D., Fehlings, M. G., Whyne, C., & Badhiwala, J. H. (2026). Timing of thromboprophylaxis in acute spinal cord injury patients: A TQIP study in 15,960 patients. The Spine Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2026.04.017
“`
• Aude, C. A., Dishong, D. M., Menta, A., Jo, J., Khalifeh, J., Hughes, L., Azad, T. D., Burnett, A. L., & Theodore, N. (2025). Catheterization method and functional recovery of neurogenic bladder in spinal cord injury. JAMA Network Open, 8(7), e2522030. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.22030
• Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine. (2016). Prevention of venous thromboembolism in individuals with spinal cord injury: Clinical practice guidelines for health care providers (3rd ed.). Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, 22(3), 209–240. https://doi.org/10.1310/sci2203-209
• Ginsberg, D. A., Boone, T. B., Cameron, A. P., Gousse, A., Kaufman, M. R., Keays, E., Kennelly, M. J., Lemack, G. E., Rovner, E. S., Souter, L. H., Yang, C. C., & Kraus, S. R. (2021). The AUA/SUFU guideline on adult neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction: Treatment and follow-up. The Journal of Urology, 206(5), 1106–1113. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002239
• Glinsky, J. V., Harvey, L. A., Tranter, K. E., Rees, L., McDonald, M., Wadsworth, B., Gollan, E., Stavric, V., Nunnerley, J., Dunn, J., Wilson, D., & Australian and New Zealand Clinical Practice Guidelines Consortium. (2025). An Australian and New Zealand clinical practice guideline for the physiotherapy management of people with spinal cord injuries. Spinal Cord, 63, 470–476. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-025-01088-8
• Hector, S. M., Biering-Sørensen, T., Krassioukov, A., & Biering-Sørensen, F. (2013). Cardiac arrhythmias associated with spinal cord injury. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 36(6), 591–599. https://doi.org/10.1179/2045772313Y.0000000114
• Hendershot, K. A., & O’Phelan, K. H. (2023). Respiratory complications and weaning considerations for patients with spinal cord injuries: A narrative review. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 13(1), 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13010097
• Johns, J., Krogh, K., Rodriguez, G. M., Eng, J., Haller, E., Heinen, M., Linsenmeyer, T. A., Querée, M., Sadowsky, C., Stiens, S. A., & van den Heuvel, M. (2021). Management of neurogenic bowel dysfunction in adults after spinal cord injury: Clinical practice guideline for health care providers. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 44(3), 442–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2021.1883385
• Kwon, B. K., Tetreault, L. A., Martin, A. R., Arnold, P. M., Marco, R. A. W., Newcombe, V. F. J., Zipser, C. M., McKenna, S. L., Korupolu, R., Neal, C. J., Saigal, R., Glass, N. E., Douglas, S., Ganau, M., Rahimi-Movaghar, V., Harrop, J. S., Aarabi, B., Wilson, J. R., Evaniew, N., . . . Fehlings, M. G. (2024). A clinical practice guideline for the management of patients with acute spinal cord injury: Recommendations on hemodynamic management. Global Spine Journal, 14(3_suppl), 187S–211S. https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682231202348
• Meregildo-Rodríguez, E. D., Vásquez-Tirado, G. A., Quispe-Castañeda, C. V., del Carmen Cuadra-Campos, M., Contreras-Cabrera, J. M., & Pinedo-Portilla, J. L. (2024). High vs. low tidal volume and pulmonary complications in patients with cervical spinal cord injury on mechanical ventilation: Systematic review. Frontiers in Medicine, 11, 1362318. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1362318
• National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel, European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, & Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance. (2025). Repositioning for pressure injury prevention. In E. Haesler (Ed.), Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers/injuries: Clinical practice guideline (4th ed.). https://www.internationalguideline.com/repositioning
• Raab, A. M., Marcus, O., Tiedemann, S., Landscheid, M., Hirschfeld, S., Ketter, G., Hallwachs, M.-C., & Michel, F. (2026). S2k guideline: Breathing, respiratory support and ventilation in acute and chronic spinal cord injury. Journal of Respiration, 6(3), Article 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/jor6030013
• Rochat, T., Legouis, D., De Stefano, P., & Quintard, H. (2026). Fever burden and neurological outcome in traumatic spinal cord injury. Neurotrauma Reports, 7, 349–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/2689288X261426901
• Sajdeya, R., Yanez, N. D., Kampp, M., Goodman, M. D., Zonies, D., Togioka, B., Nunn, A., Winfield, R. D., Martin, N. D., Kohli, A., Huynh, T. T., Okonkwo, D. O., Poblete, R. A., Gilmore, E. J., Chesnut, R. M., Bunnell, A. E., Ohnuma, T., Hashemaghaie, M., & Treggiari, M. M. (2025). Early blood pressure targets in acute spinal cord injury: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Network Open, 8(9), e2525364. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.25364
• Tranter, K. E., Harvey, L. A., Ross, J., Wadsworth, B., Berlowitz, D. J., Bye, E. A., Chen, L. W., Patterson, H., McDonald, M., Calthorpe, S., Agostinello, J., Gollan, E., Denis, S., Blecher, L., Wilson, D., Peach, J., McDonald, T., Walters, M., Mather, J., . . . Glinsky, J. V. (2025). Physiotherapy interventions for the respiratory management of people with spinal cord injury: Recommendations from an Australian and New Zealand clinical practice guideline. Spinal Cord, 63, 588–598. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-025-01116-7
• Wiles, M. D., Benson, I., Edwards, L., Miller, R., Tait, F., & Wynn-Hebden, A. (2024). Management of acute cervical spinal cord injury in the non-specialist intensive care unit: A narrative review of current evidence. Anaesthesia, 79(2), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16198
• Zameni, N., Khoshnoodi, M., Lucke-Wold, B., Harrop, J. S., & Karamian, A. (2025). The impact of tracheostomy timing on the outcomes of patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, 255, 108968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2025.108968
“`